Differences Between Student, Intermediate & Professional Models

Differences Between Student, Intermediate 

& Professional Models

In common usage these terms are becoming less relevant with the passage of time – other than a still useful way to differentiate between the costs of the ranges of instruments. The quality of student instruments has, on the whole, risen significantly while the number of true ‘intermediate’ models has declined and in the meantime the number of highly competitive models claiming to be of professional standard has increased.

As a rule in general, the best ‘made for purpose’ models still aim to achieve the following:

Student – Lighter weight, often designed to be more responsive and encouraging for young players frequently offering beginner specific keywork designs, simplified key mechanisms, quality starter mouthpieces/headjoints and supplied with durable yet convenient cases many with shoulder carry or rucksack straps.

Intermediate – Heavier built than student models and using better materials to enhance tonal quality and reward the progress that has been made in the early years of playing. Slight increases in resistance to match the player’s growing capabilities, often more fully keyed, sometimes accompanied by better quality mouthpieces and frequently supplied as outfits with more sophisticated cases that will stand up to longer periods of use.

Professional – Here you will find the highest degree of intonation accuracy, even heavier built and weighted to make the most well developed of airstreams and still hold sound together. Top quality materials are used, more hand finishing employed and the highest level of quality control, more design input from professional players and development teams, the fullest range of keywork and other options. A wider range of finishes is often available including custom looks. Greater responsiveness and tonal evenness are a priority and projection is emphasised – all with the intention of aiding the player to better produce a more personal sound and to meet the requirements of a wide range of playing circumstances while allowing the greatest freedom of expression and reliability.

It is worth noting that the quality of the mouthpieces supplied with intermediate and professional level clarinets,  saxophones and many brass instruments are often not equal to the standard of the instrument as manufacturers expect most players to have upgraded to their own choice of mouthpiece by the time they come to choosing a professional standard instrument. Some notable exceptions to this are Selmer, Yanagisawa, Holton, Conn, Bach, Paxman and Yamaha Custom each of whom includes a quality mouthpiece with their outfits.

NB – Sadly there are some very poor quality instruments, especially in the student range and often generic or ‘shop branded’ that are simply best avoided. Often compromises to the materials used, quality control and design will have been compromised  and performance will be sacrificed. When considering the purchase if a musical instrument I would always suggest seeking advice from an experienced, knowledgeable player and visiting a specialist shop who can offer the support and guidance necessary to make you feel comfortable making your choice.

The tips and comments above are the result of many years of providing help and advice, my personal interest and study, and the teaching that I have done during my career. I have many colleagues and teachers to thank for sharing their thoughts and suggestions on this and other topics. In addition I am indebted to Woodwind & Reed, Cambridge ( www.wwr.co.uk ) where, in the course of helping customers, many of these concepts have been refined and have proven helpful.

Thomas Dryer-Beers

CASS Article - Choosing a Saxophone - Incorporating How to Trial an Instrument

Choosing a Saxophone

 Written for the Clarinet and Saxophone Society Journal of Great Britain

an article by Thomas Dryer-Beers

Choosing a saxophone, either to begin one's studies, to indulge a long nurtured wish to play or to invest at the professional level on 'an instrument for life' has in many ways never been easier. The quality of the various models available is generally high at all price levels - the differences between similarly priced saxophones are not huge and even the variation between starter instruments and top of the range models is relatively small. This means that in many ways it is difficult to make a truly bad investment as long as one is aware of a few important points.

Saxophones seem to be offered from all corners of the world these days. Gone are the times when the only choice seemed to be to buy French or American. Very successful instruments are now also being manufactured in Japan, Germany, the Czech Republic, Italy, the numerous workshops of Taiwan and in recent years China, and one can become overwhelmed indeed! Added to this there is increasing globalisation of parts manufacture, assembly and sourcing of the accessories that come supplied with an instrument.

Improving designs and standards of manufacture in student saxophones and fierce competition in professional pricing have meant that the notion of an intermediate instrument, in anything other than price, is almost completely gone. Many models that were considered to be of professional standard 30-50 years ago would no longer be recommended by teachers as adequate for learning. Many once rather expensive student models have been supplanted by better-designed and less expensive new models.

In order to form an unbiased opinion of the performance of an instrument (indeed even models by the same maker) each saxophone should be evaluated on its own merits, not necessarily by its name or past history. Responsible music shops undertake just such evaluations on a continuing basis in order to be able to offer their customers the best of all the available models. This helps to ensure that as much as possible, your choice of saxophone will be of the correct standard to do the job for which it is being purchased.

Beginner Level Choice

Since so many makes of student instruments have borrowed (even directly copied) features of dominant professional instruments, it is now possible to experience the feel of many top name saxophones in some budget priced models. Some recent models have borrowed keywork design, others body tube proportions, and others attempt to reproduce the weight or mass in the brass alloy used.

So, how can a new player begin to select their sax? A good way to start perhaps, is by conversing with knowledgeable sax playing colleagues, teacher to be, school etc. Then select a recommended specialist shop in which you can have confidence. A definite plus will be a shop with in-house repair technicians as their contribution is vital in ensuring a good experience.

When you visit you should explain your situation and ask to view recommended models within an affordable price range. Having been provided with a selection of instruments to hold, or better yet to play, however inexpertly, players will almost always to be able to identify something that will help them form preferences and eventually lead them to a selection. All the many contributing factors which make up the instrument contribute to a 'feel' and players will often separate themselves broadly into two categories - those who, particularly at the earliest stages, wish to experience playing as easily as possible, and those who are looking for something more than just ease of blowing in the character of sound. I should quickly say that such a comparison test will be most useful if the same mouthpiece and reed are used across all the instruments tried. More on that later.

Any good quality beginner model is likely to see a young player through at least grades five to six. If they are keen to continue to play then their investment in a good student instrument will then have prepared the way for a smooth transition to a professional instrument when the time is right. As a result, I feel that a new player's early preferences for sound and feel can be indulged largely without adverse consequences. What really matters is that the instrument selected be well made and that a suitable, good quality mouthpiece is obtained. It is now possible to invest well at the beginning, upgrade a quality student instrument with a 'professional' mouthpiece and later purchase a 'top-grade' pro model after a few years of experience (perhaps around grade seven to eight level) with neither your learning opportunities or your bank balance suffering inordinately. I feel that this development should be very encouraging to players and might inspire greater confidence in parents with children eager to learn.

What Constitutes Good Value?

Ask a good repairer and they will confirm that even the best pads, properly seated, will not perform well if there is motion in the fit of the keywork or poor regulation. It is worth checking closely how much long key rods (such as those used for the G key, high E and bell B and Bb) are able to 'move about' when pushed sideways. Similarly, check how much lateral travel short keys like side Bb, high F and palm D experience under stress. As the fit of these keys is dependent upon both the quality of materials and good construction standards (contributing to additional expense for the manufacturer) many cheaper instruments will not pass this 'fitness' test. Such an instrument will probably have other manufacturer related problems and will be likely to become unreliable and expensive to maintain in the future. If regulations, particularly those which govern the articulated G# key, the left hand C correspondence and the related closure of the bis Bb key are not correctly set, then the finest instrument will perform little better than the worst. If an instrument is soundly made and well set-up it will be much more likely to play satisfactorily for longer and, when maintenance work is required (as it surely will be in time) the job will go much better.

Professional Level Choice

This brings me to the vexed topic of professional models. How does one choose with confidence? In the broadest terms a musician selects a saxophone at this level as a 'tool of the trade'. Does it do what he/she wants it to do? Will it be respected in musical circles? Does it fit the image of what an instrument should be? All of these points are valid ones but for me the bottom line is much simpler.

Does this instrument inspire you to want to practise and play? If so, then you are surely on to a winner. Remember also - If they all seem so good that you cannot choose between them, then you cannot truly consider any choice a mistake.

Every person's experience is bound to be different. Some find the right saxophone early on and then continue to use it out of preference throughout their lifetime. Others find that their changing tastes, the introduction of new products, a change of circumstance, professional opportunities, etc. will dictate that many different saxes be purchased during the course of a career. As long as you are being well served by your instrument you should feel good!

Before closing it is worth mentioning something regarding the increasing diversity of metals being used for saxophone bodies and the many finishes which now proliferate. In my personal opinion these are largely a diversion from the real essence of an instrument. Each reputable manufacturer attempts to create an identity for their products. Each seeks to create a consistency in the feel, intonation, resistance, appearance and tonal colour to unify their models. In general, such identity is achieved through the acoustic design of instruments, through some specific keywork features and very importantly, via the body tube mass/alloy used. Cosmetic finishes on the standard brass tubing e.g. silver plate, enamel of any colour or lacquer have a proportionally minute effect when compared with the more important structural elements. 

Different metals such as bronze, silver or nickel do make more of a difference, as the instrument will actually resonate with different frequencies given prominence by the vibrating metal. Even this is moderated by the fact that, unlike brass instruments, the tube of the sax is not fully engaged at all times in vibration. Patently it has holes in it and with the dampening effect of lots of leather pads affecting every note differently the overall contribution of these various materials is diminished. If looks are very important to you then by all means select from the range of options available with the knowledge that not much benefit comes from the finishes, and the confidence that not much loss occurs either. I'll always go with what really plays for me.

One of my teachers once gave me some very wise advice whilst encouraging me to consider the benefits I might gain from changing my own well-loved instrument for another. He implored me to 'learn to love the saxophone not a saxophone'. These words have proved themselves invaluable numerous times during my own musical career and never has this advice seemed more appropriate than during the preparation of this article.

How To Trial An Instrument

• Play all instruments with a mouthpiece and reed that you know well. Too many variables make attempting comparisons a nonsense.
• Take along or have in mind some music you are familiar with of the type you wish to play - be prepared.
• If you know the technique of over-blowing octaves and twelfths use this to see whether the instrument is 'in tune with itself'. Alternatively find a reliable 'fixed pitch' source and carefully tune to it. You can get a very poor feeling from an instrument if you do not get the mouthpiece correctly positioned on the crook for proper tuning. Be wary of relying on electronic tuners. All saxophones are acoustic compromises. When you use a tuner you are generally learning more about yourself and how you play than about any individual instrument.
• Test a range of volumes. Instruments reveal more of their tonal colour when blown loudly but you will want to know that you can sustain the sound softly as well.
• Other than checking for finger fluency and comfort, fast notes don't inform you nearly as well as sustained tones. A point worth remembering is that spring tensions or keys can be adjusted if they are too strong or too weak. Never reject an instrument because a spring feels odd.
• Test the response at the high and low extremes of the range but don't expect miracles - especially when tonguing. It takes a while to really get to know a new instrument and you may need to make some adjustments (for the better - this is known as 'progress'!). If you select a sax that plays just like your old instrument you have to wonder whether the purchase was worthwhile.
• Compare alternative fingerings, e.g. the several Bb, C, F# options to see if the instrument has been well set-up. This can be an indication of good preparation by the seller.

It is worth considering that you are most likely to choose a sax that suits your own level of ability (as long as finances permit). Therefore, as every individual is unique, not all players will find themselves choosing the same model. What matters most is that the saxophone selected is one that will provide you with the greatest encouragement and inspiration for your musical future.

The tips and comments above are the result of many years of providing help and advice, my personal interest and study, and the teaching that I have done during my career. I have many colleagues and teachers to thank for sharing their thoughts and suggestions on this and other topics. In addition I am indebted to Woodwind & Reed, Cambridge ( www.wwr.co.uk ) where, in the course of helping customers, many of these concepts have been refined and have proven helpful.
 

Thomas Dryer-Beers

The Buffet Clarinet Range - a 2016 Overview

The Buffet Clarinet Range at 2016

 

Introduction

The Buffet (Paris) Company has a grand tradition of making woodwind instruments dating back to 1825 and in its French factory in Mantes-la-Ville since 1850. The firm has earned a worldwide recognition for fine clarinets and they have developed a range of instrument options to suit the preferences and requirements of virtually any player - from beginner to the finest professional musicians. As the Buffet range is now quite vast I thought that a short summary of the differences, as I and many customers have found them, would be useful for anyone contemplating a purchase or just interested in a more thorough understanding of these fine instruments. I do not propose an engineering review full of specifications and key work listings or a detailed history of manufacturing - the Buffet website (www.buffet-crampon.com) or this encyclopaedia entry (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffet_Crampon) can provide such information. Rather, I would like to pass on my observations and my understanding of the intended performance characteristics and the nature of the different Buffet models while highlighting some of the subtle differences between them.

The Student Range

B12 - This model has been very popular ever since its introduction and it remains the industry standard student clarinet and for good reasons. The ABS resin body is lightweight and the tone holes are comfortable to cover for all but the smallest of fingers. The tone is resonant and sound is easily produced to be encouraging for the younger, often primary school aged beginner. Silver plated key work, fish skin pads and a wood-look finish are nice touches that link the B12 to the rest of the Buffet range.

B10 - This model has a more recent history and was introduced primarily as a production cost savings over the student B12. It has no metal bell or body rings and the key work is less refined than the B12 and it is nickel-plated. The B10 is however durable, uses synthetic pads and is easy to maintain. For longer-term satisfaction I prefer the B12.

E11 - The first wooden clarinet in the current range the E11 has a more interesting sound than the plastic bodied models and its greater weight makes is more satisfying both to hold and to blow for an improving player. The key work is nickel-plated and traditional bladder pads are used. It is manufactured in Germany. I consider this a budget value wooden instrument. The E11 has had a good reception on the Continent where it often recommended as a first clarinet for learners.

The Intermediate Range

E12F - This model is a new collaboration (first released 2012) between the French factory where the wooden body (derived from professional models) is produced and the German production facility in Markneukirchen where key work assembly takes place. This hybrid model offers exceptional performance at its price point. Some cost saving choices have been made including the lack of a bell rim ring and the use of stained and stabilised wood however good quality leather pads are used and the resonance is noticeably improved over the student range models.

E13 - For over 40 years this model has been the most often recommended of all intermediate clarinets and a great product for Buffet. Recent innovations including leather pads, a new bell (based on the RC professional bell), low F regulation screw and choice of case options have only help to confirm the desirability of the E13. It's internal taper - a unique design in the Buffet range - colourful sound, high quality finish and ease of tone production all contribute to making this an exceptional value upgrade clarinet. Manufactured entirely in France.

The Professional Range

R13 - Since its creation in 1955 (by Robert Carre, one of the greatest designers in Buffet history) the Buffet R13 has been the company's flagship professional model. Very popular in the USA for its all round qualities of projection, brilliant tone and flexibility in all idioms the R13 is the standard against which all professional clarinets are judged. It is the first instrument in the Buffet range to be offered at A440 tuning contributing to its popularity in the USA and UK markets.

RC - Robert Carre's innovative polycylindrical bore design and distinctive internal taper were introduced to create additional warmth and tonal centre to the already successful R13 clarinet for this, his namesake, model. These characteristics have made the RC a very popular choice with orchestral and chamber music performers for many decades. It continues to be preferred by many for the roundness and beauty of its tone. Supplied with two barrels for A440 or A442 pitch.

Conservatoire - Less well known in the UK this model is never the less popular on the continent in Europe and is a reliable and respected instrument recommended to many aspiring professionals.

 

The Advanced Professional Prestige Range

R13 Prestige - The performance qualities of the R13 but made from the finest natural, unstained, Blackwood for the best possible resonance and the additional features of metal-capped tenons, left hand Ab/Eb key, superior Gortex pads and a deluxe leather case.

RC Prestige - The performance qualities of the RC but made from the finest natural, unstained, Blackwood for the best possible resonance and the additional features of metal-capped tenons, left hand Ab/Eb key, superior Gortex pads and a deluxe leather case.

Festival Prestige - A distinctive model in the Prestige range the Festival originated from a collaboration of top French clarinettists, Jacques Lancelot, Guy Deplus and Michel Arrignon. It shares all the extra features of the other Prestige models but is supplied with two barrels and a distinctive repositioned register key vent for enhanced response of the upper register and improved focus for the throat Bb. A very popular professional choice on the continent. Supplied with two barrels for A440 or A442 pitch.

Tosca - Another example of recent artistic design collaboration by Buffet with Michel Arrignon the Tosca is an elegant styling based upon the R13 bore clarinet with innovations in keywork including a low F correction key and new design touch pieces. The Tosca has gained many followers since its introduction this Century. Supplied with two barrels for A440 or A442 pitch.

Divine - Designer Paul Meyer bases this most recent introduction to the top professional Buffet range, the Divine, upon the bore of the RC clarinet with acoustic and technical innovations. Uniquely the Divine upper joint incorporates Green Line technology on the lining of several tone holes and carbon wire based key work that helps to reduce weight and allow for greater vibration. The innovation extends to a most elegant glass fibre case as one might expect for this most luxurious of clarinets. Supplied with two barrels for A440 or A442 pitch.

A note on Buffet Greenline technology

The patented Buffet Greenline process is a reconstitution of the Grenadilla wood residue otherwise lost during the process of turning of the clarinet body and the boring of tone holes with a powder (resin like glue) that binds the residue once again into blocks (billets), which are then bored or drilled just like the original wood. However, crucially, these Greenline billets are without a grain and are therefore virtually cracks due to water absorption or temperature fluctuation are virtually impossible making Greenline the ideal material to use in any challenging conditions. Instruments made using this material are slightly heavier than those in natural wood and, as the Greenline material is denser, they have a slightly altered resonance. I believe Greenline material instruments sound more brilliant and slightly less warm than their wooden equivalents.

  ------------------- 

The comments and observations above are the result of many years of providing help and advice, my personal interest and study, and the teaching that I have done during my career. I have many colleagues and teachers to thank for sharing their thoughts and suggestions on this and other topics. In addition I am indebted to Woodwind & Reed, Cambridge ( www.wwr.co.uk ) where, in the course of helping customers and speaking with colleagues and manufacturers, many of these my thoughts have been refined.

Thomas Dryer-Beers