Thoughts on Clarinet Double Lip Embouchure

Reprinted from an article for the Clarinet & Saxophone Soceity Single Reed Doctor

Question:

I have recently overheard friends speaking about using a ‘double lip’ embouchure on the clarinet. What is this and will it help me?

SDR Reply:

The standard clarinet embouchure, used by most players is known as a single lip embouchure, one where tissue of the lower lip tissue is folded over the lower teeth to form a cushion and contact the reed. The upper lip then lies in front of the upper teeth where they contact the mouthpiece and the lip’s role is to wrap around the mouthpiece to keep air from escaping.

The double lip embouchure, as it sounds, uses both lips to wrap over the teeth therefore placing lip tissue entirely around the mouthpiece – no contact from the teeth on the mouthpiece at all.

For some players with either very thin or rather large lips, a double lip approach is simply not a physically practical option. For others it could be considered an option but it does take time and much practice to learn and to grow comfortable with the position of the upper lip between teeth and mouthpiece.

A double lip embouchure places a great responsibility on the power of an air stream to generate sufficient pressure to vibrate the reed – without the benefit of the regular ‘grip’ between upper and lower teeth. Any attempt to ‘squeeze’ the reed shut with jaw pressure is likely to result in pain as the lips, especially the upper lip, will be trapped by the teeth.

The potential benefits of a double lip approach are:

·        A rounder, warmer sound may be developed as all tendencies to compress reed and mouthpiece are unlearned

·        The necessity for much greater awareness of air stream support leading to better control

·        An increased awareness of all elements of tone production

·        Greater subtlety in control as lips are simply more sensitive than teeth

·        A strengthening of upper lip muscles as they are engaged in a new ‘drawn down and in’ position

·        A genuine rethink of what it means to ‘properly blow’ your instrument

Possible downsides include:

• Pain and the risk of damage to upper lip tissue whilst learning the embouchure position
• Fatigue of the facial muscles while adapting to a new approach
• Loss of upper note accuracy and response due to the loss of familiar pressure from the lower lip
• A potential need to move to softer strength reeds
• A feeling is instability in holding the instrument still while playing

You can see from the above that there can be numerous benefits, principally in the area of tone production and flexibility but there are many possible risks to consider and for many the double lip approach is not a viable option. (NB - I would never recommend it for use on the saxophone due to the different holding angle of all saxes, even including soprano.)

My own opinion is that giving double lip approach a try, if for nothing else as a spur to develop a better awareness of REALLY GOOD AIR SUPPORT, is worth the time invested experimenting for all those who can manage the drawn down position of the lip.

After a period of time spent experimenting and benefiting from the improved breathing and blowing skills acquired I would recommend, for the vast majority of players, a return to a single lip embouchure combined with the use of a mouthpiece cushion and the application of all the positive elements experienced:

• Better initial breathing awareness
• MUCH greater support from abdominal muscles while blowing
• A more relaxed ‘grip’ from the jaw muscles
• Increased involvement from the upper lip in the surrounding and support of the embouchure on the top of the mouthpiece

All the above can only improve a players normal sound and ability to control their instrument so what is there to lose?

--------------

The tips and comments above are the result of many years of providing help and advice, my personal interest and study, and the teaching that I have done during my career. I have many colleagues and teachers to thank for sharing their thoughts and suggestions on this and other topics. In addition I am indebted to Woodwind & Reed, Cambridge ( www.wwr.co.uk ) where, in the course of helping customers, many of these concepts have been refined and have proven helpful. 

Thomas Dryer-Beers

High Energy / High Baffle Sax Mouthpieces

High Energy / High Baffle Sax Mouthpieces

A recent question from a pupil revived this subject for me and inspired some further thoughts that I would like to share.

The subject of how a sax player creates a distinctive sound and musical personality is complicated and one of the biggest factors is the mouthpiece and reed 'set-up' they choose. For many players their choice of equipment is an evolution, from whatever was supplied with their starter instrument, to perhaps a mouthpiece recommended by a tutor or colleague, to mouthpieces that they have selected themselves following many comparisons and perhaps finally to one inspired by an influential player whose sound and musical approach seem to represent exactly what one wishes to achieve. It was whilst considering this final stage that my thoughts have recently been engaged.

One of the most attractive qualities associated with contemporary popular sax styles is an 'edgy', vibrant tone, one that is soulful and expressive and that competes, when amplified, with the sounds guitars, keyboards and synthesizers. For example, alto saxophonist David Sanborn established a personal style that was highly influential throughout the 1970's through to the present day and is now widely imitated and admired to this day. He learned how to get the most out of his Dukoff Silverite metal mouthpiece and for many players this set-up became their choice as well. Other brands including Berg Larsen (ebonite and metal), Brilhart 'Level Air' (metal), Beechler (plastic and metal), Claude Lakey (plastic) and Lawton (ebonite and metal) have also been popular (and no doubt other makes as well). The late and greatly missed Michael Brecker had huge influence on tenor saxophone sounds using his Dukoff and later Dave Guardala mouthpieces. Since the late 1980's many other manufactures have also entered the market place manufacturing 'high energy' mouthpieces.

The common factor amongst all of these mouthpieces is the presence of a 'high baffle' the terminology for which can itself cause some confusion. This feature is a reduction of the distance of the gap inside the chamber of a mouthpiece between the flat underside surface of the reed and the mouthpiece baffle itself. The result is a 'squeeze' of the vibrating air column as air passes through the gap. One could almost say that the 'ceiling' of the mouthpiece inside chamber shape has been 'lowered' to achieve this - hence the confusion. The exaggerated 'high' position of the baffle accentuates the higher overtones present in the vibrating column of air, allows for an easier response of the upper altissimo register, can make lower register tones more difficult to attack with subtlety (without playing with a subtone), may alter or accentuate intonation patterns, creates the impression of greater projection and, of course, adds 'edge'.

When many saxophonists first try such mouthpieces they can be shocked by the sounds they make. These may vary from surprisingly attractive, to promising but challenging to control, to positively ugly or sqeaky. What I believe lies behind these reactions and helps to explain the range of responses by players is something that frequently goes unstated and under appreciated:

How one uses and focuses the air stream is critical to success.

• A 'high baffle' mouthpiece must be allowed to 'do its thing' and the musician must learn how not to interfere and allow the set-up to work freely.

A frequent further contributing factor to potential disappointment is the use of too much lip pressure on the reed. High baffle mouthpieces are highly efficient. They will create their sound with a minimum of embouchure effort as long as sufficient, energised and well-focussed air is present. In fact they will often play best when matched with a slightly stronger reed as a too-soft reed will not provide sufficient resistance to the powerful air stream in use and is likely to lead to a kazoo like sound and an overall loss of control.

When I watch wonderful players deeply involved in blowing their saxes I often note the impression they can give of 'working hard' as they blow, especially as they strive for upper register notes. In fact I am convinced what is actually happening is an intense concentration on proper focus of their air stream and the removal of lip pressure.

The players are seeking the 'sweet spot':

• Where minimal lip pressure, an ideal positioning of the lower lip on reed for best vibration for the register involved and the employment of a perfectly regulated quantity of air combine to achieve the desired results.

Fine players achieve this complex balancing act so effectively that their listeners do not imagine the effort involved and, those who are themselves sax players, tend to credit their musical heroes and heroines wonderful tones and exciting musicianship to the magic of their mouthpiece - overlooking the skills they have gained through learning how to best use their equipment.

-----------------

The tips and comments above are the result of many years of providing help and advice, my personal interest and study, and the teaching that I have done during my career. I have many colleagues and teachers to thank for sharing their thoughts and suggestions on this and other topics. In addition I am indebted to Woodwind & Reed, Cambridge ( www.wwr.co.uk ) where, in the course of helping customers, many of these concepts have been refined and have proven helpful. 

Thomas Dryer-Beers

Why Pick Up the Piccolo?

Why Pick Up the Piccolo?

 

I imagine that almost any flute player who has had experience playing or owning a good piccolo will be inclined to answer quickly simply and immediately - because it is fun! I fully share and support this opinion - but it does not say enough about the benefits to the flautist so I hope to expand a little. I would say that experience of playing and better yet, playing and treasuring your own piccolo deserves to be viewed as an important part of the development and maturation of every flautist.

The similarities between the flute and piccolo are many. The piccolo sounds a straight octave higher which makes immediate sense, but some differences remain to be addressed. Despite the tendency of many new players to try to 'force' the lips into a smaller embouchure and exert extra effort for the piccolo it actually responds best with a more relaxed embouchure. Yes, the airstream may be more forceful but the lips should almost be allowed to relax to no effort at all to create the ideal small aperture desired. The placement of the piccolo on the lip is also higher than the placement for the flute and this will take some practice to refine. This studied relaxation and related embouchure placement will come with practice (long tones and slurred octaves are very useful) and once the tone and response settle down a piccolo 'attitude' should hopefully become second nature.

This practice may be a bit upsetting for the flute embouchure at first but if you think of the results gained from piccolo practice as an extension of high note practice on the flute the benefits of the greater embouchure relaxation and experimentation with placement will transfer to the flute and be very useful.

The smaller size and lighter weight of the piccolo is an obvious difference. The player's finger technique must be lighter and more precise on the piccolo as tension or unnecessarily heavy contact with keys will disrupt the embouchure and is likely to affect the cleanliness of the sound and response. Transferring some of these skills back to the flute is often beneficial in itself and may eventually result in a more fluid technique on your main instrument.

Carefully observing the tuning of characteristics of a new instrument, in this case the piccolo, can 'open up your ears' to better habits and greater awareness of the tuning on your flute. Everything becomes more critical, not harder, just requiring more refinement and subtle adjustments to work correctly.

Flute players usually discover that the piccolo uses up a smaller amount of air than the flute but requires more solid air support. Learning how to breathe more deeply and how to best hold onto the greater reservoir of air required to stabilise the sound is a very useful learning process and the discipline and awareness that one learns are sure to enhance breathing and phrasing on the flute as well. One's playing posture, important as it is to all musicians, is especially important on the piccolo and working to improve posture goes along with better breathing habits.

The piccolo is almost entirely a solo voice in the band, orchestra or ensemble and as such when it is included in a score it is intended to be heard - almost never a 'filler'. Becoming used to hearing oneself instead of feeling 'buried' within a section may be a bit nerve but it also can be a wonderful confidence boost!

Balancing the tonal qualities of different ranges of the piccolo requires careful listening and the cultivation of new sensitivities. Some ranges where a healthy tone comes easily on the flute may feel weak on the piccolo and vice versa. It is a good goal to strive for evenness of tone from bottom D to top Bb at least. The highest B and C are tricky for many players and downright near impossible on some instruments but they should be pursued, with the relaxed embouchure and very solid airstream mentioned above. If consistently achieved they are a real glory for the player and wonderful to experience.

Learning to switch between and care for your instrument is also very beneficial as it is often the case (even likely) that your flute and piccolo will have been made by different manufacturers and the key mechanisms could feel quite different. Coping with this is a fact of life for many players and it should make you a more flexible individual capable of understanding all your equipment better.
 
I would recommend regularly splitting your practice time between the flute and piccolo. Playing scales, arpeggios, interval studies and long tones on the piccolo is time well spent. When the flute is picked up again your technique is almost certain to feel more fluent. 

Anything written for the flute can be played on the piccolo (with the exception of the low notes below D) but the most rewarding playing may be excerpts from orchestral repertoire, exercise studies or solo repertoire originally for the Descant or Sopranino recorder. I recommend that all learners purchase the 2 volume method by Danielle Eden titled Piccolo Piccolo! It contains progressive studies that deal with all the familiar requirements of the instrument. There is also an excellent collection of practice exercises, studies and orchestral repertoire that has been put together by Trevor Wye and Patricia Morris titled Practice Book for the Piccolo. An excellent investment for anyone.

A final point I would add is that the ability to play the piccolo, and the ownership of or access to an instrument, can often be the 'ticket' to opportunities to perform with a wider range of ensembles and even result in participation in groups where just being able to play the flute would not be of interest.

I would encourage all flute players to embrace whatever opportunities they get to play the piccolo. Make sure any instrument you might use is in good condition by having it checked over by a repairer and then go away and do the necessary 'familiarisation' practice. When you feel that you are ready then go out and let everyone know that you have added piccolo to your skill set. You will be glad you did! 

The tips and comments above are the result of many years of providing help and advice, my personal interest and study, and the teaching that I have done during my career. I have many colleagues and teachers to thank for sharing their thoughts and suggestions on this and other topics. In addition I am indebted to Woodwind & Reed, Cambridge ( www.wwr.co.uk ) where, in the course of helping customers, many of these concepts have been refined and have proven helpful. 

Thomas Dryer-Beers

Clarinet and Saxophone Playing Position, Mouthpiece Angle and Embouchure

Playing Position - Introduction

We are all different shapes and sizes and very importantly have different teeth structures and lip shapes. The holding position that works well for some may not work well at all for others. Some players are fortunate enough to be able to just 'get on with it' and never give any thought to how they address their instrument, mouthpiece and blowing angle. For many it is not a consideration - though it should be - as how the instrument is held can be a large factor in the success one experiences in obtaining the control and sound desired. Here are a couple of tips worth bearing in mind. I encourage you to try them for yourselves.

Clarinet -

Given a typical teeth structure the best results are often found if the clarinet is held at an angle of 30 degrees from the body (off the vertical) in standing position - an angle desirable to maintain when seated as well. Do avoid resting the instrument upon a knee(s) as this leads to bad habits - there are other ways to help relieve right hand tension and aches (see previous blog on the Claritie - 02/10/15).

You can demonstrate the effect that the holding angle has by sustaining a single tone and moving the instrument through an arc from very close to the body to 90 degrees perpendicular. The effect upon the sound can be dramatic. The tone is often very strangled when the instrument is held too close and becoming completely uncontrolled when too far out - with the best sound and control to be found in between - usually around the 30 degree position.

Saxophone - 

The saxophone family relies upon a sling as part of the correct playing position as well as a correct holding position from the hands and the teeth. When standing the instrument should be comfortably straight in front of the player often with the D#/Eb keyguard (in the case of the alto) gently resting on the body at the abdomen or with the sax gently pushed forward by the right hand - whichever is more comfortable. The left hand thumb first joint must exert a pressure on the thumb rest while allowing the tip freedom to engage the octave key. The mouthpiece should then enter the mouth at a 'flatter' angle than the clarinet - something approaching 25 - 45 degrees off the horizontal. With a firm contact downward from upper teeth to mouthpiece (use of a mouthpiece patch is advised) a triangulation is achieved between the teeth, the left hand thumb and the sling. In this position the sax is secure, the embouchure is able to control the reed and mouthpiece properly and the fingers are able to move with complete freedom as required.

When seated the alto, tenor and baritone must (for all but the tallest of players) move to the side but achieving the same triangulation is desirable. What is most often overlooked is the crucial role played by the left hand thumb in maintaining a constant, reliable pressure on the thumb rest so that, in conjunction with teeth and sling, the player does not resort to tightening the embouchure in order to keep the instrument in position or find that finger tension increases in order to 'hold on' to the instrument. Be sure to appropriately adjust the angle of rotation of both crook and mouthpiece when changing from a standing to a seated position.

 

 

General embouchure comment - 

 The lower lip should make contact with the reed at or near the 'control' or 'friction point'. This is where the reed leaves contact with the mouthpiece and begins vibrating freely. Below this point the reed will vibrate in an uncontrolled manner and too far above this point the lip will effectively 'shut off' the vibration entirely. This 'correct' lower lip position is often determined and discussed by noting how much of the mouthpiece is taken in relative to the top teeth and this does vary bearing in mind the chosen playing angle, an individual's own natural individual overbite and teeth structure, as well as the concept of tone desired. This position is very personal but it is fair to say that it is almost impossible to support well and obtain the best possible performance without finding ones 'optimal' teeth position and returning to this position consistently.

A further note -

A simple way to describe the very real differences between the embouchure shape and firmness between the clarinet and all the saxophones is worth remembering. The clarinet plays best at the 'top' of its available pitch range with no firmer embouchure than is required to produce the entire range accurately. The saxophone family performs best when played well 'down' into its available pitch range using air support to centre the tone and stabilise the pitch. When this is clearly understood and achieved both families sound their best and many other 'problems' of all sort become manageable.

For both instruments it is wise to choose your reed strength to match your degree of air support rather than your willingness to squeeze your lips.

-----------------

The tips and comments above are the result of many years of providing help and advice, my personal interest and study, and the teaching that I have done during my career. I have many colleagues and teachers to thank for sharing their thoughts and suggestions on this and other topics. In addition I am indebted to Woodwind & Reed, Cambridge ( www.wwr.co.uk ) where, in the course of helping customers, many of these concepts have been refined and have proven helpful.

Thomas Dryer-Beers