Thoughts on Clarinet Double Lip Embouchure

Reprinted from an article for the Clarinet & Saxophone Soceity Single Reed Doctor

Question:

I have recently overheard friends speaking about using a ‘double lip’ embouchure on the clarinet. What is this and will it help me?

SDR Reply:

The standard clarinet embouchure, used by most players is known as a single lip embouchure, one where tissue of the lower lip tissue is folded over the lower teeth to form a cushion and contact the reed. The upper lip then lies in front of the upper teeth where they contact the mouthpiece and the lip’s role is to wrap around the mouthpiece to keep air from escaping.

The double lip embouchure, as it sounds, uses both lips to wrap over the teeth therefore placing lip tissue entirely around the mouthpiece – no contact from the teeth on the mouthpiece at all.

For some players with either very thin or rather large lips, a double lip approach is simply not a physically practical option. For others it could be considered an option but it does take time and much practice to learn and to grow comfortable with the position of the upper lip between teeth and mouthpiece.

A double lip embouchure places a great responsibility on the power of an air stream to generate sufficient pressure to vibrate the reed – without the benefit of the regular ‘grip’ between upper and lower teeth. Any attempt to ‘squeeze’ the reed shut with jaw pressure is likely to result in pain as the lips, especially the upper lip, will be trapped by the teeth.

The potential benefits of a double lip approach are:

·        A rounder, warmer sound may be developed as all tendencies to compress reed and mouthpiece are unlearned

·        The necessity for much greater awareness of air stream support leading to better control

·        An increased awareness of all elements of tone production

·        Greater subtlety in control as lips are simply more sensitive than teeth

·        A strengthening of upper lip muscles as they are engaged in a new ‘drawn down and in’ position

·        A genuine rethink of what it means to ‘properly blow’ your instrument

Possible downsides include:

• Pain and the risk of damage to upper lip tissue whilst learning the embouchure position
• Fatigue of the facial muscles while adapting to a new approach
• Loss of upper note accuracy and response due to the loss of familiar pressure from the lower lip
• A potential need to move to softer strength reeds
• A feeling is instability in holding the instrument still while playing

You can see from the above that there can be numerous benefits, principally in the area of tone production and flexibility but there are many possible risks to consider and for many the double lip approach is not a viable option. (NB - I would never recommend it for use on the saxophone due to the different holding angle of all saxes, even including soprano.)

My own opinion is that giving double lip approach a try, if for nothing else as a spur to develop a better awareness of REALLY GOOD AIR SUPPORT, is worth the time invested experimenting for all those who can manage the drawn down position of the lip.

After a period of time spent experimenting and benefiting from the improved breathing and blowing skills acquired I would recommend, for the vast majority of players, a return to a single lip embouchure combined with the use of a mouthpiece cushion and the application of all the positive elements experienced:

• Better initial breathing awareness
• MUCH greater support from abdominal muscles while blowing
• A more relaxed ‘grip’ from the jaw muscles
• Increased involvement from the upper lip in the surrounding and support of the embouchure on the top of the mouthpiece

All the above can only improve a players normal sound and ability to control their instrument so what is there to lose?

--------------

The tips and comments above are the result of many years of providing help and advice, my personal interest and study, and the teaching that I have done during my career. I have many colleagues and teachers to thank for sharing their thoughts and suggestions on this and other topics. In addition I am indebted to Woodwind & Reed, Cambridge ( www.wwr.co.uk ) where, in the course of helping customers, many of these concepts have been refined and have proven helpful. 

Thomas Dryer-Beers